Tom Manley is the UCSF’s Program Manager for the Mobile Applications Team at the University of San Francisco School of Medicine. As the program manager, he oversees a team that develops mobile applications and mobile health (mHealth) initiatives for UCSF’s School of Medicine. The mHealth Technology Group has released mobile applications targeted for public use on the iPhone. His team also develops a wide variety of service, research, clinical and administrative projects targeting J2ME, iOS, and Android devices for several UCSF departments.
Topics:
1) Capoison Hotline: a program that text messages poison tips to Californians.
2) PHI: According to Wikipedia, PHI is defined as protected health information. “Protected health information (PHI) is any information about health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that can be linked to a specific individual. This is interpreted rather broadly and includes any part of a patient’s medical record or payment history.
Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), PHI is linked to the following 18 identifiers which must be handled with special care. These 18 identifiers are the following:
- Names
- All geographical identifiers smaller than a state
- Dates (other than year) directly related to an individual
- Phone numbers
- Fax numbers
- Email addresses
- Social Security numbers
- Medical record numbers
- Health insurance beneficiary numbers
- Account numbers
- Certificate/license numbers
- Vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, including license plate numbers;
- Device identifiers and serial numbers;
- Web Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)
- Internet Protocol (IP) address numbers
- Biometric identifiers, including finger, retinal and voice prints
- Full face photographic images and any comparable images
- Any other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code except the unique code assigned by the investigator to code the data
Wikipedia (n.d.) Protected Health Information. Retrieved December 11, 20011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_health_information
The main issue that surrounds mHealth programs are telephone numbers. Tom gave an example of a Washington State program that attempted to text flu shot booster reminders to recipients. When the original shot was given patients were asked if they wanted to receive a text reminder for their booster shot. According to Tom, many of the shot recipients were inclined to receive a text message reminder when it was time to receive their booster shot.
The issue: Unfortunately, it sounded like the follow up method wasn’t well thought out. Patients interested in receiving a booster shots needed to provide written consent and opt-in to the service. Since telephone numbers are PHI and treated with special consideration under HIPAA, the text message reminder was limited to the type of information it could include in the message. Reminders were sent to the patients who said yes to the text reminder. However, no information directly tied to the time, place, or diagnosis could be included in the message. Therefore, a very general message that was ineffective was sent to recipients. PHI needs vetting before creating a mHealth text based program in the United States. We found that UCSF researchers required full consent from qualified participants to be included in their SMS based intervention studies. Some of these studies were linking mHealth programming to electronic health records to provide holistic health care services to research participants. Linking participants personal health records to the text message services allowed researchers to send messages to patients about their primary and secondary health conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, depression, and other possible diagnoses. Additionally, participants in one study at UCSF could text for lab results at anytime. This helped participants monitor their levels and engage in managing their own healthcare.
It’s possible to develop mHealth programs that benefit the public. When designing the program participant consent must be considered in order for the program to have potential success. Sending generic messages that have limited information and can’t be tied to a participant’s illness will devalue the service and intention of building health literacy skills among high needs populations